LAHORE: Veteran journalist and Associated Press Senior Correspondent in Pakistan and Afgha
nistan, Kathy Gannon, said on Wednesday both Pakistan and India used non-state actors and proxies against each other.
India has misused the issues created by Pakistan in Balochistan. The Pakistan Army has lost so many soldiers in efforts to eliminate terrorism and fighting against militants in country.
She was speaking at the Centre for Governance and Policy, Information Technology University. She said that she was unable to understand the Pakistan’s perspective on Indian involve
ment in the country, especially through Afgha
nistan.
Gannon, a Canadian national, was the only foreign journalist allowed by the Taliban to cover Afgha
nistan. All the countries, Paki
stan, Afgha
nistan and India have their own strategic interests. This is believed that Pakistan has also staff in Afgha
nistan most of them are intelligence officials, she said.
Speaking specifically on Afgha
nistan, Gannon noted that the Afghans are angry with foreigners, especially Pakistan. They believe that Pakistan supports the Taliban, supplied them weapons, they operate in Pakistan and being provided with medical assistance, she added. She also said that the operations in Khy
ber Pakhtunkhwa and FATA has pushed the militants, including several Pakistanis, Uzbeks and others into the other side of Afghan border.
She also said that Pakistan has concerns that Afgha
nistan supports Indian intelligence, but the fact is that there are militant groups operating in Pakistan.
“These groups are here in Quetta, Peshawar, Karachi, very near to Islamabad, which has created anger in Afghans,” she observed.
She further explained that fencing the Pak-Afghan border by Pakistan would definitely solve the problems.
Talking about Islamic State in Afgha
nistan, she observed that different militant groups like Jamatul Ahrar and Lahskar-e-Jhangvi are in contact with each other because they have similar ideology, similar ambitions and similar targets.
Giving her personal perspective, she said that though she was attacked in Afgha
nistan, she remains undeterred and want
s to continue working in the region.
“The actions of one mad man will not affect me,” she said. Reporting in conflict zones is difficult and independence of movement and work is complicated, Gannon noted, while explaining her embedded role with the Pakistan Army and the Afghan Army.
“There is overwhelming anger in Afgha
nistan against their own government. The Pashtun were glad to see the Taliban go, but were alienated by the Bonn Agreement,” noted Gannon, who has covered Afgha
nistan for over a decade. She also said that there were now too many groups in Afgha
nistan and so the insecurity and its repercussions are real.
Commenting on the Taliban, Gannon said, “Their aim is purely political; religion does not have a direct impact.”
On Paki
stan, she said, “Since Afgha
nistan does not accept the Durand Line, Pakistan’s concerns are and will remain real.”
The Pakistan Army has been countering the terrorists, but the army is stretched, she underscored. She also said, “Pakistan is not just paranoid, it has both Indian and Afghan antagonism to deal with.” In journalism source is very important, my sources for reporting in Afgha
nistan were my long lasting contacts with in Taliban, she said. She went on saying that details also have significance in journalism as they help a journalist build stories.
Published in Daily Times, June 22nd, 2017.